Well, we are now at week six! This week, COM 6630 is
exploring Crowdsourcing, Politics and the Global Impact of Emerging Media. Yes,
I know, putting crowd sourcing, politics and the global impact of emerging
media together may appear to be a strange combination on the surface but as Dr.
Padgett hoped, I have indeed noticed how these points work together. But can I be
honest here? It wasn’t until very recently that I actually understood this
stuff. The global impact of emerging media was easy to understand and analyze.
And so was the political aspect of it all but, I wasn’t exactly sure what crowdsourcing
was nor how it worked.
I presume that most of us are familiar with crowdsourcing
but in case there’s someone who isn’t, let’s go back. What exactly is
crowdsourcing? According to dictionary.com, crowdsourcing is to utilize labor,
information, etc., contributed by the general public (crowd), often via the
Internet and without compensation. This definition wasn’t the clearest for me.
But, I found this one, “Crowdsourcing, is using a CROWD (via the internet) as
your SOURCE to obtain needed knowledge, goods or services.” Hopefully, that
description was more helpful for those who, like myself, weren’t all too familiar!
Through the weeks reading and assignments I have learned that businesses,
individuals and organizations of all kinds have used this process to solicit
ideas and raise money as well as consolidate and promote information. The Techtarget
Network notes these entities leverage the internet, social media and
purpose-built platforms to elicit and receive the knowledge, goods or services
they're seeking. This allows them to engage with a broader spectrum of sources
than they would if they had used employees, suppliers and other traditional
sources of expertise via conventional routes of engagement.
I, like many others, was a little skeptical about
crowdsourcing and favored traditional sources but once I gathered more information,
I quickly concluded that it was the gold route! The beauty of crowdsourcing is that
you can now have access to thousands of talented individuals who can do work
faster and at a lower cost. Most would agree that two minds are better than
one. So, a lot of minds working together must be even better! This is precisely
why crowdsourcing is so beneficial, most would say. Traditionally, you’d have a
team or organization and for whatever was needed, the team would look within to
complete the task. But as we grew into a more mobile and connected society,
those walls came down and organizations began to look beyond. This relatively
new form of outsourcing is typically used by companies to save costs as well as
engage with consumers and audiences. Speaking of saving costs, I found a great
example of this on an article I found on wired.com. Jeff Howe, wired.com, mentioned
the story of a project director at the National Heath Museum in Washington, DC
who was putting together a series of interactive kiosks devoted to potential
pandemics like the flu. Well, apparently Menashe, the director, needed photos
for the project and sought to make a deal with well- known freelance photographer,
Mark Harmel, but after weeks of communication, she regretfully informed him the
deal was off. You see, Menashe discovered a stock photo site which had images
at very affordable prices, unlike the price tags attached to Mr. Harmels, who wasn’t
aware that his offers were no longer scarce. Like this example, the use of crowdsourcing
helped Menashe cut costs and still able to attain the good or services needed.
This of course wasn’t the best news for the photographer but it definitely was
a more economic route for Menashe.
As we’ve learned, crowdsourcing is used for many purposes including
generation, saving costs, solving problems and consumer engagement but
those who utilize this strategy must be careful. As mentioned previously, the
beauty of crowdsourcing is that you can now have access to thousands of
talented individuals who can do work faster and at a lower cost; however, specialists
should be wary of a few mistakes because crowdsourcing can lead to problems
when not used in the best capacity! A really clear example of this was found on
the Harvard Business Review called “4 Mistakes that Kill Crowdsourcing Efforts.”
The four mistakes were allowing messy, unfocused core interactions, too much
vertical integration and too little orchestration, producing too much social
waste and failing to leverage network effects.
Laymen’s terms, companies need to find better than decent individuals to
help find good products. After all, not everyone in a “crowd” is an expert
and/or qualified. You don’t want to receive low-quality work. Lastly, and in my
opinion, one of the most important notes mistakes we want to stand clear of, using
crowdsourcing strategy should only take place if your organization is ready. You
don’t want to cause turbulence in your business. But hey, enough of that. The beauty
and benefit of crowdsourcing outweigh the risks and now that I have a general understanding
of it all, I don’t think I could picture the future without it.
Well, I hope this show (post) has been most insightful and
entertaining even! And we ‘re going to end this week’s show on that note. Catch
you right back here next week with The SCEM View, with Deric!
Thanks.
Comments
Post a Comment